Roberts, Bryan W. (2020) Regarding 'Leibniz Equivalence'. Foundations of Physics, 50 (4). 250 - 269. ISSN 0015-9018
![]() |
Text (Regarding Leibniz Equivalence)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (983kB) |
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-020-00325-9
Abstract
Leibniz Equivalence is a principle of applied mathematics that is widely assumed in both general relativity textbooks and in the philosophical literature on Einstein's hole argument. In this article, I clarify an ambiguity in the statement of this Leibniz Equivalence, and argue that the relevant expression of it for the hole argument is strictly false. I then show that the hole argument still succeeds as a refutation of manifold substantivalism; however, recent proposals that the hole argument is undermined by principles of representational equivalence do not fare so well.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | https://link.springer.com/journal/10701 |
Additional Information: | © 2020 The Author |
Divisions: | Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method |
Subjects: | Q Science > QC Physics B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
Date Deposited: | 20 Jan 2020 13:42 |
Last Modified: | 20 Sep 2025 01:49 |
URI: | http://eprintstest.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/103131 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |