Thompson, Erica, Frigg, Roman and Helgeson, Casey (2016) Expert judgment for climate change adaptation. Philosophy of Science, 83 (5). pp. 1110-1121. ISSN 0031-8248
|
PDF
- Published Version
Download (415kB) | Preview |
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1086/687942
Abstract
Climate change adaptation is largely a local matter, and adaptation planning can benefit from local climate change projections. Such projections are typically generated by accepting climate model outputs in a relatively uncritical way. We argue, based on the IPCC’s treatment of model outputs from the CMIP5 ensemble, that this approach is unwarranted and that subjective expert judgment should play a central role in the provision of local climate change projections intended to support decision-making.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | http://journal.philsci.org/ |
Additional Information: | © 2016 Philosophy of Science Association |
Divisions: | Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method CPNSS Centre for Analysis of Time Series |
Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences |
Date Deposited: | 20 Jan 2016 14:19 |
Last Modified: | 20 Sep 2025 01:11 |
Projects: | AH/J006033/1, AH/J006033/1, FFI2012-37354, NE/M008304/1 |
Funders: | Arts and Humanities Research Council, Arts and Humanities Research Council, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, Natural Environment Research Council |
URI: | http://eprintstest.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/65071 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |