Fanelli, Daniele (2018) Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115 (11). pp. 2628-2631. ISSN 0027-8424
|
Text
- Published Version
Download (703kB) | Preview |
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114
Abstract
Efforts to improve the reproducibility and integrity of science are typically justified by a narrative of crisis, according to which most published results are unreliable due to growing problems with research and publication practices. This article provides an overview of recent evidence suggesting that this narrative is mistaken, and argues that a narrative of epochal changes and empowerment of scientists would be more accurate, inspiring, and compelling.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://www.pnas.org/ |
| Additional Information: | © 2018 The Author |
| Divisions: | Methodology |
| Subjects: | Q Science > Q Science (General) |
| Date Deposited: | 02 May 2018 11:23 |
| Last Modified: | 21 Sep 2025 01:40 |
| URI: | http://eprintstest.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/87736 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
